SURPASS-AP-Combo
Tirzepatide versus insulin glargine as second-line or third-line therapy in type 2 diabetes in the Asia-Pacific region: the SURPASS-AP-Combo trial.
Gao L, Lee BW, Chawla M, Kim J, Huo L, Du L, Huang Y, Ji L. · Nature Medicine
Study record
- Population
Adults with type 2 diabetes, HbA1c 7.5–11.0%, BMI ≥23 and stable weight. Insulin-naive apart from specified gestational or short-term use. Metformin, with or without sulfonylurea, was stable for at least two months. Most randomized participants were enrolled in China.
Read source · Supplementary materialReporting summary page 2 — Population characteristics; primary abstract- Formulation
Protocol-supplied tirzepatide in single-dose prefilled pens; insulin glargine in prefilled pens. This does not describe compounded or research-vial products.
Read source · Study protocolSection 7.1, Table GPHO.3 and section 7.1.1, printed pages 39–40- Route
Weekly subcutaneous tirzepatide versus daily subcutaneous insulin glargine, on the oral medication background.
Read source · Study protocolSection 7.1 and Table GPHO.3, printed page 39- Dose & frequency
Tirzepatide started at 2.5 mg weekly and increased by 2.5 mg every four weeks to the assigned 5, 10 or 15 mg dose. Glargine started at 6 IU/day and was titrated using fasting glucose under the trial algorithm. These are trial procedures, not personal dosing instructions.
Read source · Study protocolSection 7.1, printed page 39- Study design
Open-label, randomized 1:1:1:1 comparison. Randomization was stratified by HbA1c, country and oral medication background. Modified intention-to-treat included randomized participants receiving at least one dose. Primary noninferiority margin was 0.4 percentage points for HbA1c; selected secondary comparisons used multiplicity control.
Read source · Supplementary materialReporting summary pages 2–3 — Randomization, Blinding, Data exclusions and Outcomes- Duration
40-week treatment period followed by four weeks of safety follow-up. This was continuing treatment, not an on/off cycle.
Read source · Study protocolProtocol synopsis — Study design and Safety analysis, printed pages 11–12- Reported findings
Week-40 registry results match the publication abstract: HbA1c changes for tirzepatide 5/10/15 mg versus glargine were −2.24/−2.44/−2.49 versus −0.95 percentage points; weight changes were −5.0/−7.0/−7.2 versus +1.5 kg. Analyses excluded data after rescue or study-drug stopping (last dose plus seven days) and used MMRM. Posted HbA1c denominators were 211/194/193/193; weight denominators were 211/194/193/194. These differ from randomized group sizes. Final-report reconciliation remains incomplete.
Inspect extraction gap · Registry resultsNCT04093752 posted primary HbA1c, secondary 5 mg HbA1c and body-weight outcomes; analysis population descriptions- Adverse events
At least one serious adverse event occurred in 15/230, 14/228 and 15/229 tirzepatide recipients, versus 20/220 glargine recipients. The glargine safety denominator differs from the 230 randomized. Counts concern participants, not episodes or events attributed to treatment. Full nonserious-event and discontinuation reconciliation remains incomplete.
Inspect extraction gap · Supplementary materialSupplementary Table 4, PDF pages 5–6; top-row counts visually verified- Monitoring
Protocol safety analyses included follow-up after discontinuation or rescue. Glucose measurements guided glargine adjustment and hyperglycemia rescue; the protocol required diaries and scheduled glucose profiles. Reporting summary describes central HbA1c and other laboratory testing. Planned procedures do not establish complete observed-event ascertainment.
Read source · Study protocolProtocol synopsis Safety analysis, page 12; section 7.1, page 39; reporting summary page 3
What it supports
A randomized comparison of tirzepatide with titrated basal insulin on a defined oral medication background in an Asia-Pacific population.
What it does not establish
Open-label study with predominantly Chinese enrollment. This was a comparison with glargine, not tirzepatide added to glargine. Main-report full text remains inaccessible; abstract outcomes, public supplements and protocol methods retain their separate source depths. No general comparative safety superiority or personal pairing recommendation is established.
Funding
Eli Lilly and Company identified as sponsor in the reporting summary; complete funding and sponsor-role statements not verified.
Literature search cutoff: 2026-09-08 · Not independently clinically reviewed
Browse study library